PURI: http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/separation-of-concerns
Category: Digital Public Service Implementation
Scope: Business agnostic
Principle: Separation of concerns
Statement: (Statement) Separation of concerns ensures that each building block of a solution or service has a specific scope in terms of concern and capabilities, avoiding the replication of functionalities across different components.
IoP Layer: Organisational IoP, Technical IoP
Principle Source: Applying the principle of separation of concerns in software development
About source: In the source, an article, the principle is revidsed. The principle of separation of concerns finds application to a number of aspects of software development, some well-known, such as de-coupling modules, some less well-known, such as organising case analyses. Three example applications of the principle of separation of concerns are presented, with the aim of helping the reader to apply the principle better and to find new situations in which the principle can be applied.
PA Governance: Common
Influence in DPS Implementation life-cycle: Desire
Influence in implemented DPS attribute: N/A
|
|
| elap:PURI | http://data.europa.eu/2sa/elap/separation-of-concerns |
| dct:title | Separation of concerns |
| dct:description | (Statement) Separation of concerns ensures that each building block of a solution or service has a specific scope in terms of concern and capabilities, avoiding the replication of functionalities across different components. |
| dct:description | (Rationale) Implementing the principle of Separation of concerns in solutions and service development and provision is crucial for enhancing clarity, maintainability, and scalability. By clearly defining the scope and responsibilities of each component, this principle helps to reduce complexity and improve the manageability of the system. It ensures that each building block can be developed, tested, and maintained independently, leading to more modular and flexible solutions. This approach also facilitates better collaboration among teams, as responsibilities and interfaces are clearly defined, reducing the risk of overlapping functionalities and dependencies. |
| dct:description | (Implications) To effectively implement Separation of concerns, organisations must adopt a modular approach to design and development, ensuring that each component has a well-defined scope and set of responsibilities. Business processes should include clear guidelines for defining and documenting the boundaries and interfaces of each building block. Technically, solutions must be designed to support modularity and interoperability, with components that can be easily integrated and replaced without affecting the overall system. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are necessary to ensure that the separation of concerns is maintained throughout the lifecycle of the solution. Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration and communication is essential to ensure that all stakeholders understand and adhere to the principle. |
| elap:scope | Business agnostic |
| elap:Category | Digital Public Service Implementation |
| dct:source | Applying the principle of separation of concerns in software development |
| dct:source | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080362366500084 |
| rdfs:comment | In the source, an article, the principle is revidsed. The principle of separation of concerns finds application to a number of aspects of software development, some well-known, such as de-coupling modules, some less well-known, such as organising case analyses. Three example applications of the principle of separation of concerns are presented, with the aim of helping the reader to apply the principle better and to find new situations in which the principle can be applied. |
| dcat:theme | Organisational IoP, Technical IoP |
| elap:paGovernance | Common |
| elap:influenceInDPSLifecycle | Desire |
| elap:influenceInDPSAttribute | N/A |